The jury, on the other hand, has studied the evidence and that may be a completely different set of facts to those paraded by a salacious media, prone to inflated claims and distortions in order to make their stories more exciting.
True. It is entirely possible that the jury had inside info that the media didn't elaborate upon. However, this case was televised live every day and I saw much of it with basically just a camera in the court room, watching the testimonies same as the jury - I watched the closing arguments, etc. There were always media correspondents making their commentaries after the fact but I feel as though the evidence in the case was plainly televised for all of America to see...
