Lois & Clark Forums Forums Fan Fiction Lois & Clark Fanfic FDK - Wrong Clark (47/??)

Michael

EW: Actually, I was hiding for fear of retaliation for saying something so horrible about Lois's feet, having totally forgotten Clark's foot fetish from GEM. Apparently, my family wants to know what I look like after getting a dose of vitamin D that doesn't come from a computer monitor? I don't understand that concept either. Will post 51 early, but 52 might be late on Monday.

Eeeeeehhh… Sorry, Lois. I think he really doesn’t know what goes where.

Make up your mind, Lois, either you want them untouched or you want them experienced. Anyway, maybe Mom and Dad died too early to talk about the birds and the bees?

LOIS: You mean this novel by Grant Cather? Nah.

LOIS: NO! That's not true. People READ my stuff and breeze through the rest of the trash!

Oh, dear. I since a vacation from a computer in Michael's future. Perhaps I am posting too often for his sanity.

How about like Kinder Surprise Eggs? Chocolate and Toy.



She’s adorable, isn’t she?

/starts shivering/

/waves hand in so-so gesture/ If you need to take a buffer-slow-down, there will be griping and whining, but one will manage. /eyes stack of todo-items like summer ficathon and fall ficathon. Umm…/

Michael

LOIS: Sounds good to me! You don't mean chocolate and a surprise, do you? That works too.

CLARK: I think so.

LOIS: Clark, kissing my butt still won't get me to forgive you for lying.

Oh, I see, he's addicted like me. I'd say good, but probably 5 out of 5 doctors wouldn't agree with me.

I'm trying to catch up but RL keeps slowing me down. I'm just finishing up Part 61 and just posted part 53, so that makes my buffer at...7-8 at the moment, which is, well, stress-inducing horrible. In my opinion. If it drops down any further, which I hope it won't, I may have to post irregularly whenever I send a new part to Beta, leaving not less than a five-part buffer (any less than that would be bad, in case changes need to be made to the story. Like I just had to re-write the end of part 60, because I had forgotten I'd already covered something in an earlier part. ) If I get on a roll, I can pop out a new part in 2 days.

Needless to say, and I'm speaking for everyone else on the boards, we'd love a new Michael story. <- that's supposed to represent "nudging".

Yeah. Those. The one’s that are illegal in the US.

ARI: I agree.
MAX: Me, too.
GRETCHEN: /raises hand/
Doc FRISKIN: You guys are all nuts.

Like Lois and Clark, when they actually get busy.

Michael

Virginia, You could just revise you parts so they are shorter and thus gi e yourself a larger buffer.

Michael:

Illegal chocolates?

LEX: They sound logical to me, except for the last one.

No, LnC getting busy scenes sometimes take more than two days. For some reason, I keep getting distracted.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by John Lambert:
<strong> Virginia, You could just revise you parts so they are shorter and thus give yourself a larger buffer.

The other problem it might pose is that might mess up my neat and tidy spaced cliffies. Right now, I have like three (or is it four?) in a row coming up but if I cut the parts in half, it might double that.

What do you think?

I'm really OK either way. Part of me says it would be fun to have parts post more often, but if they are shorter I am not sure it will really be better.

Great chin-scratch-smilie. Didn’t notice that one before Michael

I've reposted your idea on Part 54's thread to see what others think. Apparently, my readers have more of a RL than I do.

I was looking for "the Thinker" but stumbled across that one. Just when I've think I've spotted all the good ones...

Well, I do hope to be finished posting Wrong Clark before the end of 2013. I was hoping before the end of 2012 but that doesn't seem likely now.

Oh, right, them. For some reason I thought you were talking about adult toys. Silly me.

LOIS: What's that?

They both take 9 months?

Oh dear. You *do* realize you’ve just added hope for another year’s worth of parts to this story, right?

Michael

Lois:We decided to create a false cover so you didn't get your hopes up, if Superman was busy with some emergency and couldn't bring Lucy.
Clark:Right. Exactly what she said.


Is that because she would tell Lois, or because Lucy would be enraged at his lunkheadedness?

Lois did think about Lex in part 53, so we did not have a lex reprive as long as promised. Still, it was way, way less thinking about Lex than Clark, even if we only look at those positive things she thought of Clark in that part, which are not many, so I really can't complain.

As it is, I think this part had no mention of Lex.

Don't forget that there will be a Book 3 after this one.

Sorry, guys, I've already promised Tank that there will be no...<<cough>> babies (other than the Kal-el one) in this Book. (My consession for forcing 2 Jimmys down his throat. ) It's in my WHAM warning.

Yep, Jimmy would have bought that.

Because she would have told Lois, or accidently let it slip, because she thought that Lois already knew.

I cannot comment on Part 53 here, due to possible spoilers.