What a serious and in-depth piece! I suspect the problem you raise here is part of the reason I'm not comfortable with Clark Kent being written as such an extreme altruist. A person needs a certain amount of selfishness to stay alive and retain their sanity. But the L&C writers didn't give this character nearly enough.
The girl who committed a heinous crime and who in the past had been sexually, emotionally, and physically abused several times. The other girl, who got pregnant due to a rape and was prevented by her father from having an abortion – and then sought an illegal clinic, knowing she couldn't bear to carry the fruit of that violence, and died during the procedure.
This is another issue you bring up that the series never addressed. To protect Lois Lane's innocence, the L&C writers created an idyllic world with no rapists. In the ugly reality, a female reporter with that kind of recklessly aggressive style would have been sexually assaulted multiple times already. Real criminals rape female prisoners before murdering them—they don't grant them a dignified death. That's why whenever I saw Lois get caught by villains, I was strongly reminded that I was watching a lovely fairy tale, a blissful escape from the rotten real world.
But why did God allow so much suffering? What was the purpose of all of it?
There's one theory worth considering. It's called "the law of conservation of misery." The central idea is that misery, like energy, is never destroyed—it just changes form or moves from one being to another. Trying to reduce suffering for one person or in one place only increases it elsewhere, where you can't see or don't realize it. For example: feeding a hungry person chicken and potatoes makes both the feeder and the hungry person happy. But the misery doesn't disappear; it's merely passed on to the chicken and the potatoes. Anyone who keeps a chicken as a pet will tell you that chickens are highly intelligent animals capable of deep emotions. And scientists have already discovered that plants not only feel pain but can also recognize the specific person who harmed them, which means plants likely possess intelligence—or even souls—that we humans can't yet perceive.
So if the Almighty ensures every human is happy on Earth, it wouldn't be fair to other living beings, because energy and resources are limited on this planet.
Of course, I'm not saying we should just lay back and let things be. But theories like this do help if the suffering in the world affects one's emotions too much. They also remind us that instead of trying to solve all the problems on Earth, it's more important to try not to pile extra misery on others. For example, if chicken is enough to satisfy our needs, don't go for Chianina steak. It's much less environmentally friendly.
There was the fact that Lois always escaped death at the last minute – whether due to her own luck or his desperate efforts
I think it's simply because we were shown a version of a parallel universe in which Lois Lane was particularly lucky. In other universes, other Lois Lanes must have died in all sorts of gruesome ways at different points before her wedding.
And who knows—maybe every one of us suffers our own share of misery in at least one version of a parallel universe. So it's all fair in the end.
And last but actually most important: this fanfic takes place at the end-not-so-end of season 1. Probably before Vatman.
“I just hope you don't pull one over on me and use all of this as encouragement to steal the next Ke– I mean, My next Kerth."
I agree with your second point—the Lois Lane in this story feels more like the Lois Lane from early Season 2, soon after Clark "robbed" her of her Kerth Award, when L&C were briefly warm, platonic friends before they started dating.