Great part ML. Loved the usual L&C banter squared. And the way you use all for names in the description to prevent confusion for us. Although, it would have been extremely funny to get them all confused until Lois or Lois decide Lois and Clark or Lois and Clark should refer to Lois and Clark as Lane and Kent laugh

I admit, I never saw the treason-thing coming.
Quote
“The allegation is that she and a partner broke into Star Labs and stole some top secret research for sale to a foreign power.”
Unless I forgot something from part 2, L&C didn't steal any information, they just got caught inside Starlabs. So that leaves the following options:
a) I just found a little plot-hole (yeah, right...)
b) Someone set out to use this event to purposely hurt Lane.
c) There is a hidden side-plot going on and someone used the opportunity to steal information.

The clerk *accidentally* destroying the evidence against Kent.
I wonder if he has a slight resemblance with this fella here:
[Linked Image]

Ages ago you mentioned we should look for what's missing. Well, Lane and Kent have been missing.

Quote
Originally posted by Framework4:
Quote
Originally posted by MLT:
[b] I'm still editing the next section.
How about one really long post on August 31, 2008? [/b]
shock Don't even joke about that, Patrick. That's so not funny.

Michael

Join us on the #loisclark Discord server! We talk about fanfic, our favorite show, life, and more! (It’s almost like the IRC days of old again!)

I go by Michael on the Archives.