LOL. Not quite.

I am not comparing the sameness of Partner A to Partner B. I am comparing the sameness of Partner A's eligible choices - the sameness of all his/her prospective Partner B's, if you will.

I am claiming that, if a black man can marry a black woman, there is no reason why he shouldn't be allowed to marry a white woman, because there is no innate difference between a white woman and the black woman. His two choices of marriage partner are equal, or "interchangeable", if you will.

It does not follow, however, that if a man can marry a woman, he should be allowed to marry a man. It would be intellectually dishonest to say, "Marry a woman, marry a man, it's the same thing."


"Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster and what has happened once in 6,000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution" - Daniel Webster