Now, you're automatically assuming that we're going to ignore any arguments you make and accuse you of intolerance. Well, I haven't seen anyone do that yet
Wendy, I am at a loss here. Did I misunderstand what Labrat meant when she said the following?:
Would these honest and valid answers be fact? Or simply opinion? Even biased opinion? It seems to me that they could hardly be anything but the latter.
It seems fairly straighforward to me. I am unlikely to have actual facts to back me up. Indeed, my perceived bias is so great as to render me incapable of forming even a so-called "informed opinion". No, any answer I might present could hardly be more than
biased opinion.
So as evidence, it would seem to me to be greatly flawed at the outset, even before it was presented.
My bias is go great, apparently, that my arguments can be declared flawed and invalid, even before they are presented.
So, yes, just as has happened in the past, I was met with allegations of bias and my arguments were declared invalid before they are even presented. I responded to this by saying that I understand that proponents of same-sex marriage have good intentions, and I am saddened that the same courtesy is not extended to me.
For which I am now reprimanded, and told to please do supporters of same-sex marriage the courtesy of assuming they will listen to me.
