Lois & Clark Forums
Posted By: LabRat Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 12:33 PM
Okay, now I've heard it all.

Stuart (hubby) decided to take the basket of dry washing upstairs and put it away, while I was making dinner. Got as far as the living room door and then came back to sheepishly pick up his mobile phone from his desk. "Just in case I get a call while I'm upstairs..."

dizzy

Sometimes, I think that thing needs to be glued to his hand.

LabRat smile (who hates mobiles and refuses to have one and is amazed that people can't seem to use them the way we always used land lines - if you miss a call, they'll call back if it was important! And if you're doing something important when the phone rings, ignore it! <g>)
Posted By: HatMan Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 07:36 PM
Well, I keep mine on a belt clip. I almost never get calls, but that way I have it if I need it or if an emergency comes up and someone needs me. (Knowing, BTW, that the odds are good that if someone's calling that number, it's probably an emergency -- or something like -- makes ignoring the ring a tad bit harder for me.)

Mom, OTOH, gets annoyed with people who call her cell first instead of the house line and people who call, expecting her to have it immediately to hand. (She, BTW, gets a lot more calls than I.)

"What, do they think I have it attached at the hip??"

/me looks at belt clip. "I do..."

Paul
Posted By: Shadow Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 08:05 PM
One of my friends started flipping out today because her ability to text message seems to be broken. *blink* *crickets* I'll be the first to admit my cell phone comes with me whenever I go out, but seriously. If I've had a long day, quite frankly sometimes the last thing I want to do is interact with the human race, and I turn off my phone. I have this other friend who is absolutely incapable of turning off her phone unless she's at work. One of these days I think I need to hide it from her <g> Talk about co-dependency.

JD
(who currently doesn't care where her phone is after a long day of errands and shovelling flower beds)
Posted By: YellowDartVader Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 08:43 PM
My sister is like that -- completely addicted. She spends almost $100 a month on extra text messages and ring tones. Me, I keep it on. Most of the time. I keep it in my purse all the time. I don't ever jump to answer it. Most of the time, I figure I can call whoever it is back at my convenience. Caller ID and voice mail are wonderful things. My mom isn't even 100% sure how to turn her phone on!
Posted By: Tank Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 09:05 PM
I don't own a cell phone... is that weird?

I also don't have an answering machine, or message feature for my phone.

When I am home, I'm online much of the time so no can call me anyway since I'm a dinosaur and only have dial-up.

Tank (who guesses the world has passed him by)
Posted By: ethnica Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 09:18 PM
Yesterday my cell phone powered down while I was on the way home. I instantly started thinking that if I became stranded or had an accident no one would ever find me...I'm talking panic attack. Of course I have a plug for the cigarette lighter that could have recharged it - but it was safe at home. *groan*

Of course as soon as I got home I plugged that sucker up.

Laura, I have the Verizon family plan and get unlimited pictures and text messaging for $5.00 a month. Believe me, with two teenagers I think I'm actually making money that way.
Posted By: YellowDartVader Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 09:40 PM
Ethnica,

The family plan would be a good plan if my sister and I were both kids. My sister and I are both adults, and I paid for my phone for years. But I told my mom that if she pays for my sister's exorborant spending, she had to pay for my phone, too. (i've never sent a text message or downloaded anything, and I've never gone over my allocated minutes). My mom and I are on a family share plan with Cingular that is actually really cheap. My mom refuses to let my sister into that because she would use all of our minutes. It is also kind of fun to watch my mom try to get the extra $100/month from her -- she doesn't really make any money working her two waitressing jobs and tanning every day and getting her nails done once a week, and her hair hilighted every two weeks.

My dad doesn't have a cell phone, and he freaks out whenever he hears us talking about the bill. I can her him in my head saying, "Why do we pay for Jenny's phone? She is 22 years old!"
Posted By: EmilyH Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/09/05 10:36 PM
I own a cell phone, but rarely use it. Now computers, I couldn't live without.
Posted By: Xanabee Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 07:23 AM
Well, I think it's very useful to have a cell phone with you when you leave the house. It comes in handy in an emergency. Just last weekend I was miles away from home, on my way to visit friends who have moved to a small village at the border with Germany, when my itty bitty lil' car suddenly started roaring like the Lion King. Oh-oh... my exhaust pipe had snapped and was dancing up and down like a water hose! smile1

So, I don't leave home without it! laugh

Ursie
Posted By: Karen Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 07:44 AM
I own a cell phone, but it's almost always off. I couldn't imagine having it on all the time. When I do have it on, I do jump to answer it, because it's usually my husband, or a friend asking when I'm going to get there, which is the only reason I turned it on in the first place.
Posted By: Anna B. the Greek Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 03:30 PM
I do have a cellphone (my father pays the bill), which I use either for sending text messages to my friends (and receiving text messages from my friends) and for whenever I'm out of the house, without my parents.

I always have it turned on, except when I'm sleeping or at school. When I'm home, it's almost always near me, but it happens to have completely forgotten about it.

I never use it for long phone calls. It makes no sense; the standard phone is so much cheaper!

See ya,
AnnaBtG.
Posted By: YConnell Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 03:48 PM
Oh, don't get me started. laugh I just can't understand these people who need to be constantly plugged in. Are they so afraid of their own company that they can't bear to be alone for more than 5 minutes at a time?

In particular, I don't understand these people who seem to think that whoever calls on their mobile is more important than whoever is sitting or standing right next to them. Frankly, I find it downright rude if I'm with someone who answers their phone and then starts having a conversation with whoever's at the other end. Texting is almost as bad, especially when you hear that irritating little snigger when they read the reply.

Yes, mobile phones are a wonderful invention and, as Ursie says, they're great in an emergency. However, mine stays switched off 99% of the time. It goes on if I want to make myself available for a specific reason - junior staff manning the office on their own for the day, for example - but otherwise I only use it when things go wrong.

Yvonne
Posted By: LabRat Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 04:53 PM
Quote
In particular, I don't understand these people who seem to think that whoever calls on their mobile is more important than whoever is sitting or standing right next to them. Frankly, I find it downright rude if I'm with someone who answers their phone and then starts having a conversation with whoever's at the other end. Texting is almost as bad, especially when you hear that irritating little snigger when they read the reply.
This is the one that always amazes me. When did mobiles overtake plain, common manners? I find it astonishing when someone is having dinner or drinks with friends and their phone goes and they answer it and start having a conversation, ignoring the company they're with. It's just plain rude.

This is what mystifies me about this technology. Why that little box has become so important to people that it eclipses everything else.

LabRat smile
Posted By: ethnica Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 07:36 PM
Cell phones don't make people rude; it's the lack of home training that makes people rude. People who are rude when using a cell phone in public or with friends (?) would be just as rude in a different setting.
Posted By: lynnm Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 09:08 PM
What makes me laugh - after a bunch of heavy eye-rolling - is seeing people in deep cell phone conversations while shopping in the grocery store. Personally, I need to concentrate while shopping. But regardless of that (perhaps I'm slower than the average bear), can't those people go for fifteen whole minutes without speaking to someone else? Are they really that freaked out by being alone?

I have a cell phone that I carry when I need to be reached (in case a kid turns up sick at school) or if I need to be able to call out in emergency (driving on a long trip) but for the most part, I don't use it. It's funny, though, that I'll always answer my cell phone but might not answer the land line because I don't get sales calls on the cell, and I've only given my cell number to those who I really do want to talk to. I always tell Ken to call the cell if I don't answer the land line because it could be I'm screening undesirables. wink

Funny how we all managed to make it to the year 2005 without always being able to be reached 24/7. Personally, I think cell phones are contributing to the destruction of society. Work that used to end at 5 or 6 o'clock can now continue around the clock since everyone can be reached at any time. I can't tell you how many calls my husband has gotten from work while he's on vacation. My attitude - only bother me on vacation if the building has burned down and there is no need for me to return on Monday.

Lynn
Posted By: MLT Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 10:15 PM
Quote
I don't own a cell phone... is that weird?

I also don't have an answering machine, or message feature for my phone.
Like you, Tank, I don't own a cell phone. And I don't have an answering machine on my home phone or any message features. I did have a car phone once, in case of an emergency. But I never gave anyone the number for the phone.

If I'm not next to a phone, I don't want anyone to be able to contact me (I might be having deep thoughts that they'll interupt laugh ). And if I need to contact someone, I can always find a land line.

I might need to get a cell phone some day for work. But I'm putting it off as long as humanly possible.

wave
Posted By: ethnica Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/10/05 10:47 PM
Quote
only bother me on vacation if the building has burned down and there is no need for me to return on Monday.
Lynn, I love that. clap Please let me plagarize it.
Posted By: LabRat Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 06:00 AM
Quote
What makes me laugh - after a bunch of heavy eye-rolling - is seeing people in deep cell phone conversations while shopping in the grocery store.
LOL, Lynn. Funnily enough, that's the only use for a mobile that I actually appreciate. <g> The shopping conversation is probably the most amount of talking Stuart and I do on the thing. goofy

"Hey...just remembered, forgot to add fish cakes to the list..."

"It's me. They've only got green apples, not red. You want those? Or will I not bother?"

And so on. Dreadfully dull, but I do appreciate that when he's left the house and I get that 'duh' moment I have a means to contact him before he comes home without the one ingredient I really needed that week. (Which is, naturally enough, the one I always forget to add to the list :rolleyes: )

Admittedly, it's also handy for finding him when he's out and about and I've had a craving, so I can say, "You want to be a sweetheart and nip into the garage and get me some chocolate on your way home...?"

Hmmmmmmmm. Maybe they're not entirely useless after all. wink

Quote
Personally, I think cell phones are contributing to the destruction of society. Work that used to end at 5 or 6 o'clock can now continue around the clock since everyone can be reached at any time.
This, however, is one of my major annoyances with the things. I've lost count of the number of times I hear Stuart on the mobile only two seconds after getting out of bed. Or he's just in the door from work and not even sat down to dinner when it rings and it's some union business needing urgently attended to. Drives me nuts. One day, I think I'm going to hide the thing till at least a couple of hours after he's home. Except, he'd probably have an anxiety attack wondering what happened to it. goofy


LabRat smile
Posted By: YConnell Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 08:19 AM
The problem is the blurring of the lines between business and pleasure. You want to keep your mobile phone switched on out of work hours so that family and friends can reach you, but you don't want work to call you. Well, I think what we need are mobile phones which can support more than one number. You have a business number for work and you have a personal number which you give out to family and friends. You need to be able to 'switch on/off' either number on the same phone.

Of course, what you can do is use the divert feature on your work phone to send work calls to your mobile. You switch the divert on when you want to be available, and you switch it off when you don't want to be available. Then you just tell work to contact you on the work number and never, ever give out your personal mobile number.

Only problem is that perhaps it's not so easy to switch the divert on and off when you haven't got physical access to the handset at work. Hmmm.

As well as destroying society, Lynn, I think they also make it easier (but more expensive!) to be disorganised. For example, you no longer have to look up the train timetable in advance so that you can tell your hubby what time to pick you up from the station, you just hop on a train and then phone him (at a cost) to let him know what time you'll get to the station. You don't have to prepare a shopping list, you just turn up at the shop and phone your other half at home (at a cost) and ask them what you need to buy. And so on.

Ethnica, I take your point about inherent rudeness, but I can't help thinking of the two guys I give a lift home to twice a week. You couldn't meet two more polite, well-mannered people, yet as soon as their mobile phone goes off in the car, they answer it and conduct a conversation with whoever is on the other end. Makes me feel like a bl***y taxi service!

Yvonne
Posted By: Tank Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 09:39 AM
I think that the cell phone morphed from a device of convenience to a symptom of a greater evil that has taken over the American working situation. That is the erosion of 'downtime'. Studies show that the majority of American workers don't take the vacation time they have 'earned', and are working longer hours than ever before since the advent of the 40 hour work week. Funny, corporate America doesn't seem to mind either.

It's gotten to the point where businesses that rely on tourism and vacationers have created commercials pointing out the statistical trends in an effort to 'nudge' people back to taking their time off.

I can see the advantage of having a cell phone for emergency purposes. I have to drive old cars and have broken down in the middle of a highway in the past (luckily a tow truck happened to pass by only a few minutes later and promised to come back for me after he dropped his current fare). I have casually looked into having a cell phone for that reason but can't justify the cost for something I wouldn't use except in emergencies.

Tank (who is also irritated by the limitations that many cell phones seem to have)
Posted By: LabRat Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 10:07 AM
Quote
Ethnica, I take your point about inherent rudeness, but I can't help thinking of the two guys I give a lift home to twice a week. You couldn't meet two more polite, well-mannered people, yet as soon as their mobile phone goes off in the car, they answer it and conduct a conversation with whoever is on the other end. Makes me feel like a bl***y taxi service!
Yes, this has been my impression. That it isn't people who are naturally or normally without manners who are behaving in this way. And that's what makes it so odd that it's become a normal part of using mobiles.

It seems that mobile phones have engendered a whole new breed of habits and ways of thinking that seem perfectly normal to thousands of people who use them - who don't seem to realise they're being rude at all. And that puzzles me, because I have no idea why that would be.

Actually, in a lot of ways, the same thing seems to have happened with the net. I often encounter behaviour on the net which I am absolutely sure the people doing it would be horrified to do in 'real life'. Would never think of doing in 'real life'. Yet, somehow, because it's online it's not considered to be rude or obnoxious or mean or plain wrong in the same way as it would be offline.

I mean, when you think about it - let's take multi-tasking. You're on irc. As well as chatting to your buddies, you're off surfing the web, reading email, writing, beta reading...which when you get right down to it really means you're being terribly rude and leaving the channel and then coming back to pick up the conversation later.

I remember being quite taken aback when someone - a newbie to irc - told me that this was like being in a group of people at a party and suddenly wandering off in the middle of the conversation, without an 'excuse me'. And you know - she was right. It's exactly like that. And yet...none of us think about it. It seems a perfectly natural thing to do. Something we don't question and don't get offended by.

And then there's the number of people who seem to believe that if you cheat on an exam using information from the net it's not cheating at all. Where did that one come from? dizzy

It's very weird. <G>

LabRat smile (who loves the net though, for all its quirks and faults <g> )
Posted By: lynnm Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 12:43 PM
Lab, I'm totally with you on the convenience of having the cell phone while at the grocery so you can pick up those little slips - a forgotten item or a substitution question. Ken often calls me to tell me he's stopping and do I need him to pick up anything. It's those people walking up and down the aisle pushing their carts and chatting about all sorts of non-grocery issues that make me want to scream. It looks to me like they couldn't find a buddy to go shopping with and can't stand not having someone to talk to, so they just call someone.

Quote
I think that the cell phone morphed from a device of convenience to a symptom of a greater evil that has taken over the American working situation.
Totally agree with Tank here. Something that initially was intended to help people gain back some free time has been put to use in such a way that it's done exactly the opposite. I mean, originally, what a great concept. Instead of going into the office on a slow work day, someone could go to the park, take along his cell phone in case of an emergency and enjoy some time away without worry that problems couldn't be handled. But instead employers seem to think that if they issue employees cell phones, the employees are then accessible for all manner of work items 24/7. Heck, even if the cell phone isn't employer-provided, the employer feels free to call. Maybe the key is to never give your employer your cell phone number.

Ken never takes his full vacation time earned. It's next to impossible because he rarely has a string of days that he doesn't have some critical deadline. Causes me no end of grief since I'm of the opinion that unless workers start to stand up and complain (dare I say - we need a return of the Unions?), things will only get worse. So when he gets calls on his very rare vacation days I get quite upset. Needless to say he doesn't let me answer his cell phone.

It's like Federal Express. Funny how twenty years ago we all managed just fine using normal post. Now everything - regardless of urgency - absolutely must be had the next day simply because it can now be done. Thus a whole new pressure on companies and their employees to meet insane deadlines, to do more work in less time. What started off as a time-saver to help relieve stress has actually added to the stress.

Which then supports what Yvonne is saying about people being less organized. Because you *can* ship something out for receipt next day, you *can* push projects to their very last possible minute. You don't have to plan ahead or manage time carefully, or, god forbid, actually say no to new projects simply because you already have a full docket. Except, instead of filling that time you gain by not being organized (those five extra minutes you didn't spend looking at the train schedule) with leisure activities, we simply shove more work into the slot. People no longer procrastinate on projects because they are lazy, it's because they have too many other things that must be done first. I know that's exactly the way I used to work. Everything shipped out via FedEx because we had no choice but to work on it only after it became the most critical project on the table.

I think you could say it's the case for almost every modern invention today. Faxes. Laptops. All of this stuff that is supposed to lighten work loads and make life easier. But life hasn't gotten easier. It's just gotten faster and thus more full with more expectations.

As for the rudeness factor, I do agree that it's rude to take a cell phone call while in company of another person. I suppose if you answered your phone and it was important, a simple "Do you mind if I take this call?" is good manners, and I'd have no problem with it. But like Yvonne, I'd be feeling a bit used if I was nothing more than a warm body steering the car.

It doesn't bother me as much the technically bad manners on IRC though. I guess because chatting on channel and multi-tasking is something that can be done without others knowing it is happening if the doer pays a bit of attention. However, I admit to being one of those people who finds it very hard to multitask on IRC because I do feel like I'm ignoring the crowd while I surf or write or whatever. That's why I don't go on very often anymore - as much as I loved talking to everyone, I simply couldn't afford the time it took.

Lynn
Posted By: Rac Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 02:05 PM
I don't have a phone other than my cell phone wink

I turn off the ringer when I'm at work and I don't answer it when I'm busy, but it is the only personal phone I have, so it is the best way to reach me. I resisted getting a cell phone until I started law school (my philosophy was that only doctors and drug dealers need to be that accessible). The school's phone plan was so limited and so expensive that the cell phone was significantly cheaper. Now, I'm pretty much expected to have a cell phone so that work can always reach me and I have absolutely no use for a land line.

My job also provides me with a Blackberry, so I'm always getting my work emails, no matter where I am. It is a bit annoying being that connected to work, since it seems I can never escape it. On the other hand, If I'm not busy, I can always leave and know that if anyone needs me, they'll be able to get in touch with me.
Posted By: Shadow Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 03:28 PM
Okay, the grocery store thing. I used to work 8 hour shifts at my neighborhood grocery store to earn money for college. It's like a prison, for one thing. It was the only job that would have fit into my schedule this summer, but I've done my time. I'd rather be poor and unemployed than...wait, halting this tangent.

Anywho, I absolutely hated it when my customers were chatting away on their cell phones about everything under the sun while I was trying to check them out. I always felt like I had to interrupt their conversations to get them to pay, inform them their coupon expired, sorry I'm out of stamps you'll have to get them at customer service, etc etc. Yes, I'll be the first one to say specially trained monkeys could have done my job, but those poeple gossiping on their cell phones kinda needed to be front and center. Maybe not quite as much as the elderly people who watched the price of every item I rang and then started whining about such-n-such not being on sale anymore. But I shouldn't have run into obstacles while doing my job just because Mary Sue assumed that she could ignore me. Not to mention the fact that during an 8 hour shift, even one customer that took the time to talk to me made my day!

Jen
Posted By: LabRat Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/11/05 03:51 PM
Well, that's just another example of being plain rude, Jen. Shame on them. razz

LabRat smile (who now remembers why she hated working with the public...and that was way before mobiles hove into view... goofy )
Posted By: Cherry Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/12/05 07:36 AM
I have a cellphone which I usually have with me when I go outside. Not because I have to be reachable at all times, nope. It's just i use my cellphone as a watch. I don't feel comfortable with something clinging to my arm anymore, so...

And, I usually use around $13 per month, and I'm the one who pays that bill, so. Well, it's not that bad, I think. laugh I mean, most of my friends uses around $13 on one-two weeks... Myah!
Posted By: YConnell Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/12/05 11:00 AM
Well, I'm of the opinion that if a company can't resist calling its employees when they're not at work, then someone is doing a very poor job of managing and the company is heading for disaster. What if one of these indispensible employees falls under the proverbial bus? What will the company do then? Run around like headless chickens for two months until a replacement can be found?

Personally, when I'm not working, I'm not available. Full stop, end of story. Like Lynn, the building has to have blown up or burned down for work to justify contacting me out of hours. I've always worked that way and always will.

Yvonne
Posted By: Rac Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/12/05 11:13 PM
In my line of work, unfortunately it is not possible to limit ourselves to the hours that would be convenient for us. Lawyers are in a client-service profession and if our client gets served with a subpoena after hours, we have to deal with it. On the corporate law side, if our client wants a deal done in three days and that means enlisting our California and Asia office attorneys to work on it so that the client can get round the clock service and have the work done on time, we do it.

It's not a civilized way to do business and I believe it is the by-product of firms and corporations treating each other like entities and not groups of people who have families and lives. To me, my client is an investment bank, not an analyst who would really like to get home early enough to attend her daughter's ballet recital, or a banker who has dinner plans with his fiancee that he doesn't want to break for the third night in a row. Similarly, their lawyer is an entity that bears the name of three long-dead white men, not someone trying to plan her roommate's surprise birthday party while working until past midnight on a Friday. Like I said, this isn't a civilized way to do business, but it is the way American business is done and other parts of the world are moving more toward our model, as opposed to us moving toward theirs. If you have money in a pension, 401K, or IRA, it is the fund managers handling your money who are putting the pressure on our clients to burn the candle at both ends to achieve results. Our clients cannot succeed if their advisors don't work the same obscene hours they do.

Companies can fall apart and thousands of people could lose their jobs if a legal problem is dealt with improperly. Our clients pay us rather handsomely to ensure that that is not the case. As a result, we're expected to work until the job is done and to make sure it is done right the first time. We wouldn't be worth our salaries were that not the case. We all knew when we accepted the job and the perks that went with it, that long hours were expected. People who don't want to put that sort of strain on themselves and their families go part time or leave the firm. It's not a fair trade off, but work in finance is unlikely to get kinder and gentler unless shareholders decide that they are happy with smaller returns.
Posted By: archbish99 Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 10:50 AM
Well, in my case, the landline exists purely because I have to have it to get DSL; I almost never use it. The cell phone is my normal means of communication, in part because the long distance is included; that means I don't have to worry about budgeting myself when I call my sweetheart at night. (Given that we talk for at least an hour per night and frequently two or three, that makes a difference. Our conversations usually end when the battery gives out. wink ) Not to mention being able to reach my parents on theirs without having to dig up their itenerary to see what hotel they're in right now, or when they hadn't found a hotel at the time they sent me the list.....

So far as answering during another conversation, it depends on relative priorities; unless we're in Bible Study praying (phone doesn't go to church), I'll usually answer for Emi or my parents to see if it's anything urgent and let them know I'll call back later. I wouldn't hold an actual conversation around someone else in most cases -- though if I'm with Emi and my parents call, she usually tells me to talk to them immediately rather than promising to call back.
Posted By: YConnell Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 02:46 PM
I hear what you're saying Rac, I really do. I also work in a service-oriented profession - IT - and have the bags under my eyes to prove it <g>. We stay until the thing is fixed, even if that means overnight and into the next day. We wait until the users have gone home so that they don't have to suffer any downtime. We work the weekends, the public holidays and any other holidays normal people get. None of that is anything special, I know - lots of other professions have to do the same.

But when I finally do go home for some downtime, that's sacrosanct. When I book holiday, that's my time, not the company's.

I guess that's a discipline that's not so easy for you to impose if a client discovers s/he needs you at 3am in the morning. frown

Actually, the worst type of working is when you're on call. I did that for a few years on Sundays, and while it's great to be able to remain at home instead of babysitting the computers at work, it doesn't half put a blight on your social life. You can't have a glass of wine with your lunch in case you're called in the afternoon. You have to remain within reasonable travelling distance of the office, so no jaunts to the seaside if it's a sunny day. You have to answer the phone even if it's not the person you're on call for but some other jerk who's got hold of your number. grumble

Anyway, what was the subject again? Oh, yeah, mobile phones. Oops. blush Sorry about the rant.

Yvonne
Posted By: Meerkat Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 03:40 PM
One thing that drives me crazy...

I work as a librarian at a largish county public library. Frequently, a customer comes up to my desk, gets my attention, and starts to ask for help (finding a book, signing up to use the computer, etc.). Suddenly, in the middle of the conversation, they get a cell phone call. They hold a finger up to me (indicating "just a minute) and then start talking on their cell phone.

It's especially a pain because I can't really concentrate on the other work I'm doing while they're standing at my desk, but I don't have enough information from them yet to start the book search... I do my absolute best to make my displeasure known by tapping my fingers on the desk or giving them impatient looks. My favorite is, after giving them a minute in case they just want to tell the person that they're at the library and will call them right back, then I just continue our conversation where we left off, as if I haven't noticed that they're on the cell phone. Usually that will make them stalk off to the lobby to have their conversation... and good riddance!
Posted By: lynnm Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 04:57 PM
Rac, like Yvonne I do understand what you're saying about the necessity of being able to get ahold of certain people in order to keep things running smoothly or even keep things from becoming critical. Certain professions kind of come with the disclaimer that work hours will not be 9 to 5 or five days a week but more like 24/7 - professions such as doctors, lawyers, IT professionals, etc. And when you add to the mix the fact that it's a global market where half the world is awake and working while the other half is sleeping, there seems to be no such thing as a normal work week any longer.

But I think what always stumps me is that it wasn't always like this. There was a time not that long ago when cell phones did not exist. Or beepers for that matter. Doctors had answering services who could reach them in emergency situations. Clients understood that a person was on vacation and out of the office until Monday and therefore were not available. Companies covered the absences of employees with other employees. And the world turned around rather nicely.

Now, however, companies lead you to believe that if you were to be unavailable for consultation even long enough to take a shower, the entire capatilistic structure would collapse. No one is ever willing to wait any longer. (Again, I do understand that certain situations cannot be postponed, but I'd argue they are in the minority by far.) Everyone *must* have what they need now. No one is willing to wait, and it's a situation we've inadvertently created by making it possible for people to have everything with a phone call at any time of the day or night.

So it's exactly as Rac has described. Companies are no longer made up of workers with lives. And sadly, it's no longer the demanding and paying-for-service clients who take advantage of people but the very employers themselves. They demand that employees sacrifice everything or else risk losing a good job. That's pretty sad.

I guess if I agree to work for a company for a certain salary, I want to know how much of my life that company now owns. And if it turns out the company owns my entire life - every single minute I must be available for consultation - then I want to renegotiate my salary substantially upward. Companies reap the benefit in the way of happy clients and more money gotten off the sacrifice of employees' personal lives. Seems a tad bit inequitable if you ask me.

Like I'm always saying to Ken, no one lies on his or her deathbed and wishes he/she had spent more time at the office. But I have a feeling that our generation and the ones to follow will really bear the burden of the now blurry line between being in the office and being unavailable.

Meerkat, I think if I were you the minute it becomes clear that the person is not just answering to say "Call you back later" I'd gather up the stuff in a neat pile, back my computer out of this person's records, and call for the next person in line to step forward. Pretend that rude cell phone call taker is no longer even standing there!

Lynn
Posted By: YConnell Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 05:15 PM
Quote
Companies are no longer made up of workers with lives.
And the crazy thing is that people with lives generally make better workers. Drones are great for stamping out widgets and sticking labels on boxes, but if you want some original thinking, a little creativity, an understanding of human nature, or up-to-date knowledge of world affairs, then you need someone who's plugged into life, not a robot who's divorced from it.

Yvonne
Posted By: NearlyNoelNeill Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 05:36 PM
This is one of those blue moons when I dropped in to read "off topic" and I've been rewarded. I think some really good points have been made all around. I'd like to add one final strong belief of mine--having been both workaholic and 'lazy bum' at various times in my career. I thought that the 'job owned me'...but the truth is that I let it.

It is each of our individual responsibilities to prioritize our lives in such a way that we live in our values first and our needs second. Let's not kid ourselves--coming home late and missing a child's school activity is a "choice". It means that I/you/he/she's values are more oriented toward whatever the "work" brings than the particular family activity for example. Are we willing to pay the price of leaving the office by--enduring a late night tomorrow, lost brownie points, whatever? Or, if we're paid an hourly wage, and the extra time is truly the difference between paying bills and not,it helps to acknowledge that "the job isn't making me" stay...it's that "my responsibility to pay the bills" is something I value. Taking back control of the situation can help one feel less frustrated by being "on call". I have a dear friend who travels a great deal and tries like heck to be home to tuck his three sons in. Sometimes he's away a good part of the week. But he makes up the time by giving them his full attention when he *is* home and he let's them know that the only reason he stays away is so they can have fun things.

I find that my blackberry has been instrumental in enabling me to conduct both my life and my work with no one the wiser. But I exercise discipline by NOT having it with me on social occasions--or in announcing to my companion 'I apologize for leaving this on, but there is one phone call I expect that I will have to take. Forgive me.' Usually, my companions are accommodating because the alternative is that we'd NEVER be able to have a social engagement in the first place. On the flip side, I've been known to be with a customer and answer the phone for a family member saying "Are you dead or dying?. Because if not I have to hang up on you now." That invariably gets a laugh while sending a message to my customer that I CHOOSE to take a phone call if I know it's a family member calling.

So, as with so many things, we can demonize the tool. But it's only rude/foolish/too much etc. in the hands of an individual.

My two cents. Have fun watching the Jackson verdict!

Sherry
Posted By: LabRat Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 06:49 PM
Well, I never expected my mini-rant to breed such a fascinating thread. It's been so interesting reading all your posts. thumbsup

Meercat, I'd ask why cell phones are allowed the sacrilege of ruining all that blessed library silence - except that I worked as an assistant librarian for ten years and know that one has long since been abandoned. laugh And that was before cell phones were invented.

If it were me though, I'd be sorely tempted to leave the room and let them stand there for at least ten minutes after they finished their call before I came back to attend to them. Or, as Lynn says, yell 'Next!'. Perhaps that would buck their ideas up. Or at the very least point up to them how mannerless they're being.


LabRat smile
Posted By: MLT Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 07:16 PM
Quote
Certain professions kind of come with the disclaimer that work hours will not be 9 to 5 or five days a week but more like 24/7 - professions such as doctors, lawyers, IT professionals, etc.
I used to believe that too. I'm a lawyer after all. And I used to give out my home phone number to clients (in the days before the surpremecy of the cell phone). Yep. I worked 24/7. When I wasn't in the office, I'd be taking calls from clients or bringing work home. But then I worked long hours in school, too. So I thought it was just part of the practice.

I believed that right up until I had my nervous break-down. I can remember sitting out on the steps of a friend's house, tears streaming down my cheeks, with a friend who told me that I was killing myself - that I needed to take some time off. I told her that I couldn't - I had to be available at all times for my clients. The remainder of the conversation went as follows:

"What would happen if you died of a heart attack tonight? You wouldn't be much good to your clients then."

"I'm not going to die of a heart attack tonight."

"But what would happen then?"

"I don't know. I guess I'd have to call Mike and ask him to take the matters I have in court tomorrow. And I'd need to call Paula and tell her..."

"ML, you're dead. You can't call anyone."

Two weeks later, I had a complete breakdown. I couldn't get groceries without bursting into tears (deciding between butter and margarine is very stressful, you know laugh ). I had to quit my job and take stress leave.

That took place during the second season of Lois and Clark (nice how I worked that in, eh? laugh ). Since that time, I guard my 'me time' as precious. I refuse to carry a cell phone or even wear a watch. And I write Lois and Clark stories to keep from allowing work to clog up my brain in the evening.

Maybe there are people out there who can work 24/7. But I'm not one of them. If you need a lawyer and I'm not available, please call someone else. I won't be at all offended. I'd rather be sane than be your lawyer.

And you know what? Since I took that attitude, I've been a much better lawyer. More is not always better.

ML wave
Posted By: Wendymr Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/13/05 08:32 PM
Quote
Maybe there are people out there who can work 24/7. But I'm not one of them. If you need a lawyer and I'm not available, please call someone else. I won't be at all offended. I'd rather be sane than be your lawyer.
You go, ML!! razz razz razz razz razz

He's got a new job now, in Canada. And he doesn't do that any more. He works 9-5 - sometimes to 6 - and gets much more job satisfaction. He's still in a relatively senior position. Sure, he's taken a pay cut compared to what he used to earn in the UK - but hour for hour he's paid more now. wink The company doesn't have our cellphone number. They have the home number but, since he started, have never used it. And in fact no-one in this company works later than around 6, other than dire emergency. He says the place is like a ghost town come 5.15!

And his health has improved. But not before he had a mini-stroke and lost some of the vision in one eye - directly attributable to work-related stress. Be warned - like ML's experience (and I'm so glad you're better now, ML!), working too hard can seriously injure your health. It can even kill you. frown

The long hours culture is dangerous, bad for us and actually bad for the economy - stressed and demotivated workers mean lower productivity, more days lost through illness, higher staff turnover and so on. (When I was an academic, I carried out a survey on this three years running - always, there was a very high correlation between long hours, stress and illness).


Wendy smile
Posted By: Meerkat Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/14/05 04:36 PM
As for the library thing, I'm often sort of trapped. Most of the time there *is* no other person in line (even at a busy library, with four people on the desk the line goes fast most of the time), and I have to stay at my computer. But I do generally ignore them or try to force them to realize how rude they're being. Though, you know, I find much of how I react to such situations depends on what kind of mood I'm in... if I'm in a bad mood, I refuse to give an *inch* on the rules, etc.

And as for libraries being bastions (is that the word I mean?) of silence... that is no more. Our rules officially changed from "Cell phone use is not permitted in the library" to "cell phones are only permitted in the library if conversations are brief and quiet and the ringer is set to silent." Even that doesn't hold, much. Although some of our worst offenders are... the police. They come in to use the computer, and I don't know if they're on duty or what, but they have these radios (walkie-talkies, cell phones, something) that every 30 seconds or so give off a little ring and you can hear somebody talking as if they're on speaker phone. Ugh, it's *such* a pain in the butt. Of course, they help with discipline, so we tolerate them.

I'm glad to hear the stories of people who were workaholics and found their way out of it. We actually had a sermon at church the other day that talked about the dangers of workaholism, how it can be a disease almost as much as alcoholism, how it can destroy families to the same degree, etc.

The kids/teens who need to be in constant contact with their friends worry me as much as the adults, honestly. It's almost as addicting as television or the computer... constant entertainment with no real value. Chatting constantly about nothing, etc. And having your friends to entertain you while you walk to classes, grocery shop, or do chores keeps people from having to think, look around, enjoy the weather, daydream, and experience all of the other private enjoyments of solitude. It somehow seems a loss to me, even though I do the same thing (okay, maybe it's walking around reading a book, but still).

I do have a cell phone, but half the time I forget to charge it. I always figure that I can recharge it in the car, although if my battery died that wouldn't happen. I can change my own tires, however. smile
Posted By: Artemis Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/14/05 07:28 PM
Fascinating discussion, this. In the military there's an axiom: "If the the government wanted you to have a life, they'd issue you one."
But, even given that, there is some attention to designating one person "on call" for a set time to handle urgent matters.
I remember going into work at 5 a.m. my time to talk to Washington where it was 8 a.m. Interestingly, they left at 5 or 6 p.m. their time, so things would quiet down on my end after 2 p.m. I remember phone calls at home around midnight, but it really was urgent and the next day's operation hinged on a decision. So I did it. All this was before cell phones.
Now we are retired and have a cell phone and like Rac's parents, the kids can reach us anytime, anywhere, any hotel/condo/airport. But we don't spend a lot of time chatting on it. I spend more time here on the boards and irc.
I do have a favorite story of mine about the excesses of cell phone use. I had just finished a meeting in Tucson, Az and was at the airport to fly home. The line at America West was out the door with people like me, tired and wanting to get home. A lady with 2 kids finally gets up to an agent and she's talking to a friend/sister/whatever on her cell phone. She keeps talking while she is in front of the agent. He is waiting to hear the flight she wants to go on. She keeps talking on her cell and gestures to her 10 year old son to give the agent the tickets. He says "I don't have any tickets".
The line starts to get restless. Departure time is approaching for a lot of us. Finally the agent says to the woman, "Ma'am. I need your full attention. You need to put down the cell phone."
She says "Just a minute" to the cell phone, then starts yelling at her son "I told you to go into the den to get the tickets!" Now the success of the whole trip is riding on the shoulders of a 10 year old boy with the mother taking no responsibility. She continues talking to her friend about a dress for some occasion. The agent still doesn't even know the flight she wants. He repeats, "Put down the cell phone." She doesn't. He gets the supervisor over, she hauls the family away to get their tickets taken care of and the agent gets to the next person in line. The woman is still talking about the dress on the cell phone.
This was all very loud and we in the line turned and eyed each other and shook our heads in mystery.
And yes, I made the plane just fine.
cool
Artemis
Posted By: rivka Re: Way Too Dependent! - 06/23/05 06:06 PM
Quote
Originally posted by LabRat:
Meercat, I'd ask why cell phones are allowed the sacrilege of ruining all that blessed library silence - except that I worked as an assistant librarian for ten years and know that one has long since been abandoned. laugh And that was before cell phones were invented.
Not at the library I go to! (Although admittedly, I haven't been there in quite a while. Hoping to this summer.) They have a no-cell policy, and while I've occasionally spied people in the stacks or study areas (it's a BIG place) quietly on phones, trying to do so in the face of one of the librarians would almost certainly get you tossed out.
© Lois & Clark Fanfic Message Boards