This is kind of specific, so it's possible that there's nothing out there, but I figured we have such a diverse group of people/experiences here that it was worth a try to ask.
I'm working on a problem for law school - all fake facts, don't worry, there's no confidentiality involved. Specifically, it has to do with defamation, but the kicker is that the defamatory statement was "said" in l33t (leet) on a Facebook wall.
Part of the issue is to whether there was actual publication - you have to prove that someone actually read the allegedly defamatory statement and understood it.
The side I'm assigned is that no, it wasn't published. So as part of it, I wanted to make the point that when this statement was said in l33t on a facebook wall, it's pretty clear from the entire set of circumstances that it was tongue-in-cheek and therefore, no, the reader did NOT understand it as defamatory - he understood it, if at all, as a joke.
Everything I can find online is about leet as evolved from computer gaming, about how people disagree with what constitutes leet (is lol leet, or only t@1k1ng w1th subst1tut3d ch@r@cters?), etc.
Does anyone know of any computer/internet related sources - even magazines would be okay, doesn't have to be scholarly work - that would support this idea that outside the gaming forum (and perhaps even there), comments in l33t are understood to be tongue-in-cheek/satire/made in jest?
Thanks!
Bethy