Heinlein was a fantastic writer. Everything he wrote sold extremely well, but the last few years of his life it was because the name 'Heinlein' was on the cover. At the time he wrote the essay, though, he was just starting out as a novelist. Everything he'd done up to then had been short-form. So I would amend the third rule
You must refrain from rewriting, except to editorial order.
and add that the author MUST revise his/her story.
It is vanishingly rare that a writer can hold an entire novel in his or her mind, so it is almost inevitable that small plot holes, timeline inconsistencies, draggy or incomplete scenes, excessive or unlabeled POV shifts, punctuation errors, obvious misspellings, and the like will appear in the first draft. One
must review and sometimes rewrite entire sections of stories. Readers of 2014 are not as forgiving of such things as they were in 1947.
I have read things on other boards (and occasionally on these) which have wonderful concepts but get tripped up because the author didn't want to revise and correct the simple things he or she could have easily fixed. Such things damage the story because they jar the reader out of the fictional world the author is creating.
For example:
Facebook status:
People quit saying "make love not war." Man love is war!
This status seriously needs a comma or two somewhere. Revision, anyone?
I think what Heinlein was saying was the same thing Ms. Rusch is saying: Don't obsess over perfection because you'll never get there. Make it good. Make it as good as you can. But don't be paralyzed by trying to make every word, every phrase, every bit of imagery absolutely perfect.
Because none of us is perfect.