Lois & Clark Fanfic Message Boards
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Top Banana
Offline
Top Banana
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Quote
Hmm. I have yet to read a fic which I find violent enough to garner an Nfic rating.
I know I've seen at least one fic (though don't ask me for an example--it's been awhile since I saw it, and I probably stopped reading somewhere in the middle), which was in the LC Fanfic Archive which, to me was too violent for a g-fic rating. Or made more than a passing reference to a theme that, although it might not have had anything to do with sex, just seemed "too adult" in my mind for g-fic.

On the other hand, I've also seen fics in the Nfic section at Annesplace that didn't really seem to NEED the Nfic rating--and my rating system is pretty rigorous.

Sure, Nfic being called "smut" is a convention (and not just in L&C fic)--but couldn't the convention have been made around a word with a less negative--and in some people's minds--overly dirty (read: unneccesarily, almost disgustingly, kinky--as opposed to just kinky)--connotation?

Although . . . come to think of it, I don't know of any other word besides "sex," or "sex fics" that might fit. huh Ah well. It was an observation anyway. Might be fun to try and come up with another word (I know, I'm a geek), but not in the g-rated section. :p


"You take turns, advise and protect one another, even heal or be healed when the going gets too tough. I know! That's not a game--that's friendship!" ~Shelly Mezzanoble, Confessions of a Part-Time Sorceress: A Girl's Guide to the Dungeons & Dragons Game

Darcy\'s Place
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 402
C
Beat Reporter
Offline
Beat Reporter
C
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 402
Quote
Sure, Nfic being called "smut" is a convention (and not just in L&C fic)--but couldn't the convention have been made around a word with a less negative--and in some people's minds--overly dirty (read: unneccesarily, almost disgustingly, kinky--as opposed to just kinky)--connotation?
Apparently I've been reading fanfic for too long because the word "smut" doesn't have a particularly offensive connotation for me. "Porn" - which is also used frequently in discussing fic - seems much stronger. It's interesting how different words are interpreted by different people smile

However, I don't quite understand the discussion of the word as it relates to this fandom. I see the word "smut" used very rarely around here. L&C uses "nfic" in its place almost exclusively, so far as I've seen. I don't even know what the N stands for, for that matter, though I guess I've always assumed it meant "naughty". (The Jane Austen fandom calls its R & NC-17 fics "Naughty Bits" or NB's, which is almost too cute a euphemism for my taste, but my assumption of the word 'naughty' probably comes from that.) If it stands for something else, somebody clue me in!

Caroline

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Offline
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Yes, the n stands for naughty. It's a convention which I myself think is out of date. Back when it was coined the majority of nfic was, I believe, of the mind candy, romp variety. Nowadays, the genre encompasses a far greater range of themes.

But we've had countless debates on this one over the years and have yet to come to a concensus on what would be a suitable replacment, so it stays nfic until we do. laugh

Incidentally, smut hasn't really been a term used in FoLCdom - although I have begun to see it sprinkled around now and then more recently. Perhaps that's because it's a widely used term in other fandoms? I wouldn't know because I've never really read nfic outside of FoLCdom. There are some authors in FoLCdom who do find the term offensive as they equate it with porn sites. I myself don't like it, simply because it doesn't fit in with my own interpretation of what my nfic stories are about. It generates a quite different impression in me whenever I see it. But, if it's widely used for nfic in other fandoms, I can understand why people use it and don't mean what I do when I say smut.

LabRat smile



Athos: If you'd told us what you were doing, we might have been able to plan this properly.
Aramis: Yes, sorry.
Athos: No, no, by all means, let's keep things suicidal.


The Musketeers
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 402
C
Beat Reporter
Offline
Beat Reporter
C
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 402
Quote
But we've had countless debates on this one over the years and have yet to come to a concensus on what would be a suitable replacment, so it stays nfic until we do.
Actually, I think it works fine. It's recognizable to everyone who's been here more than five minutes and it had the advantage of anticipating (however inadvertently) the MPAA's hissy fit over fan fiction sites using their ratings. I, at least, don't see "nfic" and automatically think PWP. I don't think you have to spend very much time at all at the nfic archive to gather that, as you say, a wide range of themes are explored in the stories there.

No debate from this quarter smile

Caroline

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 377
Arawn Offline OP
Beat Reporter
OP Offline
Beat Reporter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 377
Caroline,
Quote
Really? I've always thought that nfic in every fandom garners more interest and enthusiasm than PG fic. The more you lock it down, the more allure it has and the more people are beating down the doors to get to it. I've certainly never had the impression it was "dismissed" by readers, here or anywhere else.
I suppose it could work both ways. But I believe the quality of the writing would draw more innocent victims, then a warning to get a password in order to access to all the dirty secrets in there(and if that is what people hope, I believe they are in for a let down.)

DSDragon,
Quote
As Yvonne said above, the Nfic section also includes especially violent fics that take them over the PG-13 rating. Not to mention, the sex portrayed isn't always "vanilla," whether it's between two consenting adults or not.
Considering what you see on TV-these days I hardly recall any especially violent fics. Vanilla is a relative term, but for me it refers to Lois and Clark practising straight intercourse and oralsex, something most people I know would consider vanilla. Sure they have sex in some strange places too that might be exotic, but the sexual acts themselves are always rather mundane. S&M, group sex, anal sex, slash etc simply doesn’t exist, the focus in the genre always on the romance, not expanding sexual boundaries.
Both Lois and Clark also have a conventional view of the relationship. They don’t sleep around, treat sex with reverence, Clark at least always have the intention to make an honest woman out of Lois. This is what I mean when I said that I would even encourage children to read them if I wanted to indoctrinate them into a traditional sexuality.

Quote
Also, I think it's strange that many people in this thread use the word "smut" as an all-'round term for Nfic. To me, "smut" is more on the line with "porn," "S&M," or even "rape," than with "vanilla sex" or "making love." Any thoughts?
English isn’t my native language, dictionary .com seems to use smut as synonymous to obscenity. But I don’t think that is how the term is used. To me smut is graphic description of sexuality for the purpose of titillation. It’s gliding scale but eventually you get to erotica/pornography where every word is intended to arouse the reader and nothing else. Bodicerippers are smutty, but Private magazine is pornographic, see?

I don’t know if anyone read my link about why fanfic is so smutty, but I thought this very interesting.

Quote
Chicks aren't wired that way. Mostly, chicks have to know something *about* the warm bodies on screen before it becomes anything but a fairly clinical *insert tab A into slot B* sort of a thing. Simply looking at people having sex is USELESS if I don't have some sort of clue about them, don't care about 'em, don't have an emotional investment in 'em. This is why a movie like, say, Dangerous Liasions or 9 1/2 Weeks is hotter for a chick to watch than something entitled "Reform School Sluts" even though the latter involves substantially more *ahem* pink bits on screen.
In addition, chicks like written porn. I do not know of *any* men who actually buy or read romance novels. Do not let the name fool you. These are fairly explicit, definitely strong lime, and, depending on the writer, fading well into lemon hues. [Lime: very strongly implied sex between characters but without graphic description of body parts and so forth. Lemon: graphically depicted sex between characters with explicit description of body parts.]
I'm sure you know the ones, with the raised shiny lettering for the title. They have a picture of a guy and a chick on the cover, chick probably in period costume, guy probably wearing black pants and a flowy white shirt that apparently stops buttoning at the navel. Odds are she's got her leg up around his waist, no doubt showing a considerable expanse of what will most definitely be referred to in the text of the thing as 'creamy thigh'.
Men do not buy these novels. Men do not, so far as I'm aware, *read* these novels. However, judging from the contents of my local bookstore, this is a genre which exceeds science fiction, westerns, mysteries, and fantasy in sheer volume of shelf space. Obviously, this stuff sells to someone. I submit that the 'someone' in question is chicks.
Now, given that chicks like to know something about the characters engaging in hot sweaty monkey sex *and* given that chicks like written porn, the average romance novel has to plow through fifty or so pages of 'getting to know the characters' before there's any sex. This takes time. (I'm getting to the point. Honest.)
Enter the fanfic.
Here are characters familiar to the reader. All the 'getting to know them' stuff is taken care of by actual canonical material (the television show, the anime episodes, whatever). These are characters that the reader already knows tons of stuff about. What they wear, how they act, what they look like, their beliefs, how they know each other. Lots of stuff. Heck, odds are that these are characters the reader *likes* on one level or another. I know I don't read fanfic for things I am not a fan of, anyway.
In fanfic, suddenly it becomes possible to skip straight to the 'good bits' without going through all the boring exposition and stuff first. The reader already KNOWS all the boring exposition. There is no real need to do all that. You can skip right to the sex part. From a chick perspective, smut fanfic is the heroin of porn. It's admirably quick, to the point, and still strangely satisfying (for the reasons pointed out above).


I do know you, and I know you wouldn't lie... at least to me...most of the time...
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,166
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,166
Quote
OK, but really are their anyone that finds Nfic section kinky today?
Okay, I haven't ran across anything that I'd consider 'kinky' on this board, but I have read some stuff at Anne's place that I would consider kinky.

I haven't yet read Tainted Love, but I did read Dirty Pool and Tainted Love is the rewrite of that fic. Dirty Pool (very good fic) included a a sexual assault, and I'm not sure I'd want one an underage child of mine reading that, so I appreciate the password protection.
~~

Quote
Obscenity laws in the US have always been a source of great contention. After all, who decides what is obscene?
This is true, but when I get an unsolicited email showing sex acts, I consider that obscene.
~~

Quote
And, as I said in my previous post, our experience is that some minors lie to get access to nfic. You might as well just not bother having the button at all and just have a free for all, for all the barrier they provide.
But, LabRat, as you previously said:

Quote
It hasn't been unknown in the past, for example, for the admins to be blasted with email from irate parents who have just discovered their little darlings reading nfic. (Although they have backed down sharply when we can show them proof - through the password/access application forms - that said little darlings lied their back teeth off about their age to gain access
I think this is good that you have this to show mommy and daddy. Of course if mommy and daddy are so worried about their little darlings, then they need to watch them closely. Having filters doesn't always help because the kids figure out how to turn them off.
~~

Quote
I do remember being frustrated when I wasn't successfull in finding any Lois and Clark nfic I could read!
I'm surprised. There are all sorts of 'back doors' that I've stumbled on accidentally. (I ain't tellin'.)
~~


Quote
Also, I think it's strange that many people in this thread use the word "smut" as an all-'round term for Nfic. To me, "smut" is more on the line with "porn," "S&M," or even "rape," than with "vanilla sex" or "making love." Any thoughts?

Well, okay, maybe not "rape." But "smut" definitely has a MUCH less-innocent connotation for me than "consenting sex between adults" or "making love."
I agree, Darcy. To me, smut definitely has a much less innocent connotation.

Quote
Although . . . come to think of it, I don't know of any other word besides "sex," or "sex fics" that might fit.
I like 'nfic'. It's simple enough that adults know what it means, but a 9 or 10 year old doesn't.
~~

Arawn (or anyone else from Europe), I wonder if you have considered the differences in American advertising. It's been a long time since I went to Europe, but I assume it's still the same. When I visited Europe, I was a bit shocked to find topless ladies on billboards. That was about 30 yeas ago. In the States, we still don't have topless ladies on billboards. That's just one example, but for the most part, nudity is not used in advertising here. That may be one reason why some Americans would be upset by the idea of their kids getting to these sites easily.
~~

Arawn and I were posting at almost the same time. I think guys read romance novels. They just hide them really well. Okay, so they don't read them as much as the ladies, but they read 'em. I for one get aggravated at romance novels because there's often too much characterization. I guess I'm not the typical lady because I usually hate 'chick flicks'.


~~Even heroes have the right to dream.~~
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,293
Top Banana
Offline
Top Banana
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,293
Well, so far on this thread we have one person advocating a change to the existing system, and between nine and ten people supporting the status quo. I think the numbers speak for themselves. wink

Yvonne

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,367
Kerth
Offline
Kerth
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,367
Quote
To me, smut definitely has a much less innocent connotation.
Than just saying "sex"? I mean, I understand that "smut" has a darker connotation, but if there's detail involved and you're not airbrushing the act, it doesn't matter if you call it sex, naughty or smut. <shrug> It's nothing I'd want my 12 year old son reading. blush

I'd like to think that when I use those elements in a story it actually adds to the plot/characterization, but I also know that viewpoint is entirely subjective.


Lois: You know, I have a funny feeling that you didn't tell me your biggest secret.

Clark: Well, just to put your little mind at ease, Lois, you're right.
Ides of Metropolis
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Offline
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Quote
But, LabRat, as you previously said:
Yes, I worded that one badly. What I meant is, it takes such little effort to be dishonest with the click button system that it might as well not be there, if all you have to do is click on 'yes, I'm over 18' and you're in.

With the password system, it's amazing how often we actually catch out the dishonest (and I'm not saying here how they trip themselves up. wink ), simply because the system requires a little more effort to get there, even if you are being dishonest.

You will never be able to get a 100% completely foolproof system, but I believe the password system is better than the click button system any day of the week.

LabRat smile



Athos: If you'd told us what you were doing, we might have been able to plan this properly.
Aramis: Yes, sorry.
Athos: No, no, by all means, let's keep things suicidal.


The Musketeers
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Top Banana
Offline
Top Banana
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Quote
Yes, the n stands for naughty. It's a convention which I myself think is out of date. Back when it was coined the majority of nfic was, I believe, of the mind candy, romp variety. Nowadays, the genre encompasses a far greater range of themes.
Hmmm . . . Back when I read BtVS fic, I always thought it stood for the "N" in "NC-17." But "naughty" fits too.

And I agree that "Nfic" is definitely better than "sex fics" or even just "smut." My earlier posts about "smut" was just an observation I'd been curious about since I started reading Nfic in the BtVS fandom, and wanted to get other people's take on it.


"You take turns, advise and protect one another, even heal or be healed when the going gets too tough. I know! That's not a game--that's friendship!" ~Shelly Mezzanoble, Confessions of a Part-Time Sorceress: A Girl's Guide to the Dungeons & Dragons Game

Darcy\'s Place
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 910
Features Writer
Offline
Features Writer
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 910
Quote
In fanfic, suddenly it becomes possible to skip straight to the 'good bits' without going through all the boring exposition and stuff first. The reader already KNOWS all the boring exposition. There is no real need to do all that. You can skip right to the sex part. From a chick perspective, smut fanfic is the heroin of porn. It's admirably quick, to the point, and still strangely satisfying (for the reasons pointed out above).
I'll bite about the quote, because I think the question of why fanfics go towards "NC-17" territory and why people like them is a loaded one. The author of this defends sex for itself based on the framework of a specific series and that's definitely one reason some fans gravitate towards adult fic.

But another is that other readers simply like stories that don't hide anything, be it the fact that people curse, they get hurt and have sex. For instance, I know that when something grave happens and someone writes "shoot" instead of putting in a profanity, the moment for me loses some of the depth and becomes almost cartoonish. Now I can tolerate that from a primetime show, but I don't read fanfic to see the same thing happen in writing as it does in TV, my expectations are for fanfic to go further than that (as my expectations of literature in general are). I realize this varies incredibly from person to person and that's part of why there's diverse array of genres in any fandom.

So it's not just about sex/violence/cursing for the sake of shock value or aestheticism for some, but in seeing how this affects the characters and/or shifts the plot to move the reader.

alcyone


One loses so many laughs by not laughing at oneself - Sara Jeannette Duncan
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/llog/duty_calls.png
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Offline
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Quote
Hmmm . . . Back when I read BtVS fic, I always thought it stood for the "N" in "NC-17." But "naughty" fits too.
It may well do, in that fandom. But in FoLCdom, because of the emphasis at the time on nfic being romps and there being very few of the serious, angsty long nfic we have in the mix now, it was naughty and it did fit.

Nowadays, not only does it not fit the angsty stuff, imo, it also doesn't cover the nfic that has no sexual content, but is rated above PG13 for violence, non-sexual adult themes etc.

So it jars a little in my head these days. But, if I don't think about what it stands for (which I rarely do), it does okay. laugh

Quote
I'll bite about the quote, because I think the question of why fanfics go towards "NC-17" territory and why people like them is a loaded one.
And, like all reasons why people do things, an incredibly varied one, too. I don't really think it's possible to give one definitive answer on that.


LabRat smile



Athos: If you'd told us what you were doing, we might have been able to plan this properly.
Aramis: Yes, sorry.
Athos: No, no, by all means, let's keep things suicidal.


The Musketeers
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 377
Arawn Offline OP
Beat Reporter
OP Offline
Beat Reporter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 377
Aria,
Quote
No, you were clear. You appear to me to be saying that other pornsites obviously can, so why can't we? That's a whole different issue to me.
No you misunderstand me. My point wasn’t that “everyone else can, why can’t we?”. But that since American law enforcement doesn’t prosecute the multitude of erotic literature sites that are a hundred times more sexually explicit then the Nfic archive , this form of erotica is obviously legal in the US.

I asked Americans on another site I frequent and endured substantial ridicule, not only for my taste in literature, but for how any Americans could believe that smutfic wasn’t legal.

As for the underage reader: they claimed that as long as the site does not go out of its way to recruit children for the express purpose of tainting their minds (something that is virtually impossible prove in court and now we are taking about sexual deviance like sadism or paedophilia), the parents have no legal leg to stand on. A button with above eighteen was more then enough legal protection for even the heaviest porn in the US.(commercial pornsites followed certain other rules in the nineties but that was overuled.)


Quote
A lot of them work out of other countries where US law enforcement really cannot do much to take them down. Or, they do happen to operate in the US and have managed to fly under the radar. Also, there is a *ton* of law enforcement work just to get rid of one, but naturally, even as all this work is being done, more and more sprout up.
Actually I have now been told that a porn site is MORE likely to be hosted in the US because of it’s very strong free speech laws.

That the LC fanfic community, that has the tamest smutfic I have ever seen, would be prosecuted or even sued for obscenity is just patently absurd.

Labrat,

Quote
What I meant is, it takes such little effort to be dishonest with the click button system that it might as well not be there, if all you have to do is click on 'yes, I'm over 18' and you're in.

With the password system, it's amazing how often we actually catch out the dishonest (and I'm not saying here how they trip themselves up.), simply because the system requires a little more effort to get there, even if you are being dishonest.
Personally, I only think it makes it harder for everybody to get in. When I filled in the form all I said was that I was over eighteen. I saw no way that you could verify that, which made me wonder why it was in place. I mean even if some ten-year-old fill in the blanks wrong, all she has to do is try a new email address. I can’t see that it would be much difference your system and the standard “I’m over eighteen” pop up. I can also not see why it's necessary to have stricter security measures on this site then bona fide pornsites. If people want porn I can't imagine way they would come here.

Quote
It generates a quite different impression in me whenever I see it. But, if it's widely used for nfic in other fandoms, I can understand why people use it and don't mean what I do when I say smut.
Does English have a word for ladies hm erotica, in my own language there is one, you know the creamy thighs bodice ripper thing, I thought smut was that word in English.


Alcyone,
Quote
I'll bite about the quote, because I think the question of why fanfics go towards "NC-17" territory and why people like them is a loaded one.
I’m sure there are many different reasons why women are into smutfic all people are different but as an all purpose explanation I thought she made a lot of sense.


I do know you, and I know you wouldn't lie... at least to me...most of the time...
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,367
Kerth
Offline
Kerth
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,367
Quote
Does English have a word for ladies hm erotica, in my own language there is one, you know the creamy thighs bodice ripper thing, I thought smut was that word in English.
The words "Harlequin romance" come to mind...


Lois: You know, I have a funny feeling that you didn't tell me your biggest secret.

Clark: Well, just to put your little mind at ease, Lois, you're right.
Ides of Metropolis
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Offline
Boards Chief Administrator Emeritus
Nobel Peace Prize Winner
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,362
Quote
Personally, I only think it makes it harder for everybody to get in. When I filled in the form all I said was that I was over eighteen. I saw no way that you could verify that, which made me wonder why it was in place. I mean even if some ten-year-old fill in the blanks wrong, all she has to do is try a new email address.
As I said earlier, I'm not going to go into the checks we make on the access form. But our process does make checks and there are ways - not always, but it is possible - that we can recognise that we're being lied to. We've had several instances in the past where we've denied access because the board member in question has been underage and we've known they're lying about being over 18. That's the benefit, for me, of the password system over the click button system.

The latter, as far as I understand it, is an entirely automatic process which isn't checked by a human being and has no manual input from the website owner. When an access form is submitted to the admins on this forum, it is checked out and if there are red flags there we'll deny access.

Again, it's by no means foolproof and I'm by no means suggesting that we catch everyone, but we do a better job of catching some of those who aren't entitled to be in the nfic forum than a click button system does, imo.

Quote
I can also not see why it's necessary to have stricter security measures on this site then bona fide pornsites. If people want porn I can't imagine way they would come here.
I thought I'd already gone into this one and explained the reasons why we have a password/controlled access system here. It's got nothing to do with being concerned that someone who likes hardcore porn might read our stories. It's all about ensuring that nfic is restricted to those over the age of 18 and not made freely available to minors.

I think we're getting several issues confused here. One issue is whether the sexual content of nfic on this forum is any worse than that in any popular Top 10 novel you can pick up off a supermarket shelf. My opinion on that one is no, it isn't. In fact, I've seen worse - much worse - in the published novel.

However, that doesn't mean that I would let my eight-year-old niece read the published novel. Any more than I'd print off some nfic and give that to her.

We've already discussed that the issue of where the line lies is different for practically everyone out there and that there's very little concensus on where that line should lie. That's a debate which will never be solved, I suspect.

In the end, this is the system the admins have chosen for this forum. Just as the owner of another website - or a porn website - may choose the click button, that's entirely up to them.

Basically, it boils down to this. We admins like an easy life. laugh And it's a truth that those who like to write/read nfic here are, as far as we know, mostly content with the status quo. They are therefore unlikely to complain if we continue with this system.

What is also highly likely is that were we to replace this system with free for all access to nfic, we would get complaints from those who don't like nfic, whether they could avoid it or not. And, most likely, from the parents of minors who don't think it's right for their children to read that kind of sexually explicit content.

Faced with that choice? We're hot dang gonna go with the path of least resistance and the system that cuts down the abusive emails we get. wink

LabRat smile



Athos: If you'd told us what you were doing, we might have been able to plan this properly.
Aramis: Yes, sorry.
Athos: No, no, by all means, let's keep things suicidal.


The Musketeers
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Top Banana
Offline
Top Banana
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Quote
Faced with that choice? We're hot dang gonna go with the path of least resistance and the system that cuts down the abusive emails we get.
I would too.


"You take turns, advise and protect one another, even heal or be healed when the going gets too tough. I know! That's not a game--that's friendship!" ~Shelly Mezzanoble, Confessions of a Part-Time Sorceress: A Girl's Guide to the Dungeons & Dragons Game

Darcy\'s Place
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 910
Features Writer
Offline
Features Writer
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 910
Quote
I’m sure there are many different reasons why women are into smutfic all people are different but as an all purpose explanation I thought she made a lot of sense.
And I didn't mean to imply that the girl was wrong and I was right at all so I hope it didn't get read that way. My intention was just to provide an alternative among the many possibilities out there.

Of course, even what qualifies as NC-17 or "smutfic" itself is a hairy question, which comes to get entangled in the reasoning of why people read why they read. The girl you quote seems to be talking about the Plot What Plot? phenomenon, which I think lands squarely in the definition of smutfic/erotica. However, fics that contain sex scenes past the PG-13 level are not all PWPs. I don't think that all of these can be defined by "smut" in the traditional sense (I'm recalling some of the debates I read in the nfic archive about what qualifies as nfic). I mean the rating system will label a long fic with one sex scene that crosses the line the same way as a fic focused on a tryst.

And I'm not harping on that before someone misquotes me and tells me we need a system. That much is obvious and it figures no system would be perfect. But's something to consider when thinking about genres. I'm sure some people don't touch fics labeled as NC-17, smutfic, lemon, etc, because they can only concieve of it as a PWP. It goes back to what someone posted about the connotations behind words, which can easily apply to genres as a whole.


One loses so many laughs by not laughing at oneself - Sara Jeannette Duncan
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/llog/duty_calls.png
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,454
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,454
Yes, as LabRat has explained very clearly, there are many reasons behind the rules for access on these boards - which are the same as the rules for access on Zoomway's message boards, Annesplace and other sites hosting nfic in FoLCdom. It's partly, too, as she's said, history in the way this fandom has developed. The main archive does not host stories rated above PG13 - and, believe me, there've been complaints that some of those stories cross the line between PG13 and adult fic on one ground or another. Much of that's a matter of perspective and personal thresholds, though.

What it comes down to is that either you'll understand and respect the reasons behind the system in this fandom or you won't. I can understand that, if you have a lot of experience of other fandoms, this may seem very restrictive. Writing in another fandom now, I do find that I have to watch my language usage a little less than I did in FoLCdom, for example. Practices vary.

Ultimately, though, the old saying When in Rome... springs to mind. wink The bottom line is that these restrictions are in place to protect the site owners. They're the ones who'll face the irate emails - and, as LabRat has pointed out, have faced them. They run the sites; they're entitled to set the rules. Our choice is to go along with them or set up our own sites where we can make our own rules wink


Wendy smile


Just a fly-by! *waves*
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 377
Arawn Offline OP
Beat Reporter
OP Offline
Beat Reporter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 377
Quote
I thought I'd already gone into this one and explained the reasons why we have a password/controlled access system here. It's got nothing to do with being concerned that someone who likes hardcore porn might read our stories. It's all about ensuring that nfic is restricted to those over the age of 18 and not made freely available to minors.
Yes, believe it or not I knew that before starting this thread. What I wondered was why you went further to ensure this then other fanfic sites(that I know of) despite the content being by the standard of fanfic pretty tame(IME). In fact you apparantly go further then regular erotic stories sites.

I thought there was a reason beyond general prudishness(not that it’s anything wrong with that). Considering that just about all posters seems rather open about sexual topics most even writing “harlequin romance” stuff themselves.

Quote
In the end, this is the system the admins have chosen for this forum. Just as the owner of another website - or a porn website - may choose the click button, that's entirely up to them.
Absolutely, and I hope I haven’t come across as someone that think otherwise.

Quote
What is also highly likely is that were we to replace this system with free for all access to nfic, we would get complaints from those who don't like nfic, whether they could avoid it or not. And, most likely, from the parents of minors who don't think it's right for their children to read that kind of sexually explicit content.
If you say so. I have difficulty understanding how this can be such problem since the fandom isn’t in the spotlight. Does Lcfic attract more minors then other fansites? (I suppose that could be it since the show was rather family oriented). Then again how does the Harry Potter sites handle it, It would surprise me if this kind of problem didn’t dwarf yours, but perhaps they are just more thick-skinned and inclined to take the extra work.(not implying laziness now, how much free work people want to spend on fansites is of course up to them.)

Quote
Faced with that choice? We're hot dang gonna go with the path of least resistance and the system that cuts down the abusive emails we get.
Well I certainly wouldn’t want to increase the burden on the administration theme. I was just curious and thought perhaps that an easier access would increase the popularity of the place, bringing in more fans and writers. For myself it doesn’t matter one whit, I have already read all the naughty fics I want. wink


I do know you, and I know you wouldn't lie... at least to me...most of the time...
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Top Banana
Offline
Top Banana
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,437
Quote
Then again how does the Harry Potter sites handle it, It would surprise me if this kind of problem didn’t dwarf yours, but perhaps they are just more thick-skinned and inclined to take the extra work.(not implying laziness now, how much free work people want to spend on fansites is of course up to them.)
The HP fandom creates whole different sites specifically for Nfic only. The gfic sites won't allow Nfic on them. An example of this would be PhoenixSong.net, and it's Nfic equivalent, The Broom Cupboard


"You take turns, advise and protect one another, even heal or be healed when the going gets too tough. I know! That's not a game--that's friendship!" ~Shelly Mezzanoble, Confessions of a Part-Time Sorceress: A Girl's Guide to the Dungeons & Dragons Game

Darcy\'s Place
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  bakasi, JadedEvie, Toomi8 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5