Because this wouldn't be the poll section without it... - 04/25/03 01:35 PM
...I had to post this poll. 
Re: Because this wouldn't be the poll section without it... - 04/25/03 09:07 PM
okay, you rigged this, didn't you, wendy? i tried to vote for the second option, and it chugged along really really slowly, almost as if it was going to reject the vote. just didn't seem to know what to do with it.
still, i stuck with it, let it chug along, and after it realized that i wasn't going to let up, it gave in and processed the vote all at once. even showed me the results without my having to ask. i think it wanted to get rid of that window as quickly as it could.
what did you do to that poor poll to make it so reluctant?
Paul
still, i stuck with it, let it chug along, and after it realized that i wasn't going to let up, it gave in and processed the vote all at once. even showed me the results without my having to ask. i think it wanted to get rid of that window as quickly as it could.
what did you do to that poor poll to make it so reluctant?
Paul
Re: Because this wouldn't be the poll section without it... - 04/26/03 04:11 AM
Okay, this time I wasn't blinded by that aura of innocence and that cute smile...
Looks like it's unanimous, El.
LabRat (singing Won't Get Fooled Again...)
Looks like it's unanimous, El.
LabRat (singing Won't Get Fooled Again...)
Re: Because this wouldn't be the poll section without it... - 04/29/03 11:41 PM
hmm.. interesting. if the next person votes that el is evil, that will take it up to 66.6% 
Paul
Paul
Re: Because this wouldn't be the poll section without it... - 04/30/03 02:37 AM
Quote
if the next person votes that el is evil, that will take it up to 66.6%
El
![[Linked Image]](http://community.the-underdogs.org/smiley/angry/king2.gif)
Re: Because this wouldn't be the poll section without it... - 04/30/03 10:45 AM
Well, I did it, but unfortunately, it rounds, so you're at 67% evil, El, not 66.6% We all know the truth though....
Annie
Annie