Jamie Glazov said another thing that I found very surprising:
And it should be no surprise that Oslo Professor of Anthropology, Dr. Unni Wikan, found a solution for the high incidence of Muslims raping Norwegian women: the rapists must not be punished, but Norwegian women must be veiling themselves.
If a Norwegian professor had really said that Muslim rapists were not at fault for committing rape and should not be punished for it, but Norwegian women should assume responsibility for their own rapes and try to avoid being raped by adapting to the Muslim culture by veiling themselves, then such a statement would undoubtedly have caused an uproar followed by an extremely heated debate in Norway, and Swedish newpapers would undoubtedly have written something about it. But I haven't read a thing about a purported suggestion that Norwegian women ought to be veiling themselves to protect themselves from Muslim rapists.
So I googled Unni Wikan, and this is what Wikipedia says about her statements about Muslim rapists and Norwegian women:
In 2001 debate about the culture of rape amongst Muslim immigrants in Norway, she said that Norwegian women are 'blind and naive' towards non-Western immigrants. "I will not blame the rapes on Norwegian women. but Norwegian women must understand that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it." "Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes." For example, by not inviting into their homes Muslim men with little knowledge of Norwegian culture.
You can most certainly still disagree with Unni Wikan's views on Muslim rapists and Norwegian women, but at least she doesn't appear to have said that Muslim rapists are blameless, or that Norwegian women ought to veil themselves.
And Jamie Glazov, who wrote that Anti-Valentine piece, seems to be playing rather fast and loose with facts in order to suit reality to his own views, if you ask me.
Ann