Thank you for your apology, Marilyn. I'm sure that the GE at the heart of this matter will thank you for it, too.
If I may, I would just like to correct a slight error in your post here:
I tried to apologize and offended even more.
This is the first apology I've received from you on the GE's behalf. Had you offered such an apology during our private email discussion on this subject, I have no doubt that it would have been immediately accepted by the GE in question. However, I also believe that of more importance to this GE than any apology was that the factual inaccuracies in your original post be corrected.
I don't believe that you posted in anything other than an innocent fashion and that there was malice intended in what you posted. It was clear to me in our discussion that you wholeheartedly and sincerely believed that you remembered the edits made by this particular GE clearly and precisely.
Unfortunately, there didn't need to be an intention to distress to cause enormous hurt for the person you misrepresented in your post, which was factually incorrect. As the evidence subsequently sent to you proves. However, we all make mistakes, and as I suggested to you previously, sometimes the most real of memories plays us false. It happens. To all of us at one time or another.
At the time, before being presented with the evidence, you didn't accept this argument and insisted that your facts were wholly correct. That is your perogative, of course. But it did mean that to resolve the matter we had to present you with evidence to show that your belief in your recollection was misplaced.
I believe that as EIC of the Archive I have a responsiblity to act on the behalf of a GE who is hurt by someone posting to a public forum telling the world that she did A, B and C, when she knows that A, B and C never happened and when she asks me to. Especially when A, B and C would be a slightly dumb thing to do for a GE. (EDIT to clarify this and thanks to Marilyn for making me realise it needs tying down.
) The GE in question was unable to deal with this timeously herself because of pressing real life commitments. She did, however, want the inaccuracies in the original post corrected ASAP as they were a source of some embarrassment to her.
We all know what trouble lack of accuracy in reporting causes.
I apologise if you feel that you've been badly treated over this matter. But I believe that the inaccuracies in your original post - no matter how innocently intended - demanded correction. I don't believe that this was unreasonable in the circumstances.
I now consider this matter closed and hope that you do likewise.
Regardless, if you wish to discuss it any further, I would suggest that as it's of no further interest to anyone but the parties involved, that any future discussions be kept to private email, where they began.
LabRat